The Rookie
With its handling of the current situation in Egypt, the Obama administration's lack of experience in foreign policy matters is on full display. When the crisis first began to boil, the White House was notably mum (which in hindsight was probably best). Whether the administration would support the protesters or Mubarak, our long-time ally in the region, was not clear. When the administration finally let its position be known, it came down on the side of the protesters. Big mistake.
By issuing statements supporting an "orderly transition of power", the US has basically pushed President Mubarak into a corner. The delicate nature of the situation called for a much more nuanced pronouncement from the US.
Instead of calling on Mubarak to acquiesce to the protesters' demands, the president should have simply stated something like, 'The United States fully expects its friend President Mubarak to take the necessary steps to do what is in the best interest of Egypt.' This would have given Mubarak enough wiggle room to step aside and not be seen as caving to the dictates of outside forces. Twisting Mubarak's arm in public only serves to embarrass and annoy him. Talking tough to an egomaniacal leader is best done behind closed doors.
It's quite easy to get caught up when you are witnessing an uprising by a group of people demanding fairness and democracy. Exhibiting your excitement and support for such a transformational event is fine when you are a concerned citizen, or even a representative in congress. But as the President of the United States, your public reaction to such events must always be measured. It is quite understandable that Mr. Obama (who after all was ushered into office on theme of 'change') might find it difficult to mute his enthusiasm for the protesters in Egypt. But if he is to have any far-reaching success in foreign affairs, the young president must learn to lead with his head, and not with his heart.
By issuing statements supporting an "orderly transition of power", the US has basically pushed President Mubarak into a corner. The delicate nature of the situation called for a much more nuanced pronouncement from the US.
Instead of calling on Mubarak to acquiesce to the protesters' demands, the president should have simply stated something like, 'The United States fully expects its friend President Mubarak to take the necessary steps to do what is in the best interest of Egypt.' This would have given Mubarak enough wiggle room to step aside and not be seen as caving to the dictates of outside forces. Twisting Mubarak's arm in public only serves to embarrass and annoy him. Talking tough to an egomaniacal leader is best done behind closed doors.
It's quite easy to get caught up when you are witnessing an uprising by a group of people demanding fairness and democracy. Exhibiting your excitement and support for such a transformational event is fine when you are a concerned citizen, or even a representative in congress. But as the President of the United States, your public reaction to such events must always be measured. It is quite understandable that Mr. Obama (who after all was ushered into office on theme of 'change') might find it difficult to mute his enthusiasm for the protesters in Egypt. But if he is to have any far-reaching success in foreign affairs, the young president must learn to lead with his head, and not with his heart.

0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home